Kraken Crypto denies SEC claims: Tokens Aren’t Securities
- Kraken Crypto rejects SEC allegations, asserting assets like ADA and SOL aren’t classified as securities under the Howey test.
- The exchange criticizes SEC’s regulatory approach, citing overreach and lack of clear guidelines for digital asset trading.
- Industry leaders Ripple and Coinbase join Kraken in condemning SEC’s inconsistent stance on cryptocurrency regulations.
Kraken Crypto denies SEC claims: Digital Assets Are Not Securities
Kraken, a well-known cryptocurrency exchange, has firmly responded to allegations made by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC claimed that Kraken had violated federal securities laws by offering digital assets that, in their view, qualify as unregistered securities. However, in a legal filing, Kraken strongly denies these accusations, stating that the assets in question do not meet the legal criteria to be classified as securities under U.S. law.
Kraken Crypto: Defense Against the Allegations
Kraken's response centers on the argument that the digital assets in question—such as Cardano (ADA), Algorand (ALGO), and Cosmos (ATOM)—are not investment contracts. The exchange claims that the SEC's case does not align with the legal standards set by the Supreme Court’s ruling in the SEC v. W.J. Howey Co. case, which outlines the conditions that determine whether an asset is an investment contract. According to Kraken, the SEC has failed to demonstrate that these assets meet the criteria of the Howey test, and therefore, they should not be classified as securities.
Kraken also firmly denied any violations of Sections 5, 15(a), and 17A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as the digital assets involved, including assets like Filecoin (FIL), Flow (FLOW), and Solana (SOL), are not considered securities or investment contracts.
Kraken Crypto Claims of Overreach and Lack of Clarity
Additionally, Kraken criticized the SEC's approach to regulating digital assets, accusing the agency of overreach. The exchange argues that the SEC does not have the authority to regulate its exchange platform since the assets it offers are not securities. Kraken also claims there has been a lack of clarity and fair notice from the SEC regarding its legal obligations, making it difficult for the exchange to comply with regulatory expectations.
Kraken’s response highlights a growing frustration in the crypto industry with regulatory uncertainties, echoing criticism from other major players like Ripple and Coinbase.
Also Read: Pi Network's Mainnet, Will year 2025 be the Big Launch
