Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is intensifying its scrutiny of federal agencies, with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as its latest target. As part of its oversight push, DOGE’s SEC affiliate is actively seeking public tips on waste, fraud, and abuse within the agency. This move has sparked political and regulatory concerns, with critics questioning Musk’s motives and potential conflicts of interest.
DOGE’s Expansion into SEC Oversight
Musk’s DOGE initiative has been expanding its reach across federal agencies, adding over 30 affiliate pages on X (formerly Twitter). One of these affiliates, DOGE SEC, recently called for public assistance in identifying inefficiencies within the SEC.
A post on Feb. 17 stated:
"DOGE is seeking help from the public! Please DM this account with insights on finding and fixing waste, fraud, and abuse relating to the Securities and Exchange Commission."
This effort aligns with Musk’s broader mission of government efficiency but also raises concerns about his personal stake in regulatory matters. Musk has also suggested that DOGE could play a crucial role in ending U.S. inflation, emphasizing how addressing government overspending could reduce inflationary pressures.
Musk has had a long and contentious history with the SEC, including a recent lawsuit where the agency accused him of underpaying Twitter stock investors by over $150 million. In response, Musk criticized the SEC, calling it a “totally broken organization” and accusing it of ignoring serious financial crimes.
Democrat lawmakers, including Maxine Waters, have voiced concerns that Musk could misuse sensitive SEC data, particularly the Consolidated Audit Trail (CAT)—a massive system tracking all U.S. stock trades. Lawmakers worry this could give Musk insider access to market data, which they claim he could use for personal or financial gain.
According to Politico, one lawmaker warned:
"This is the single largest treasure trove that he can pillage for his personal gain or vendetta."
Beyond the SEC, DOGE has also gained legal access to federal student loan records after a Feb. 17 ruling by a federal judge. The agency is now seeking access to IRS taxpayer data, signaling a much broader effort to increase transparency in federal financial operations.
The White House has attempted to address conflict-of-interest concerns. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stated that President Trump would not allow any conflicts, and Musk himself has promised to recuse himself from any direct involvement.
DOGE’s aggressive approach could have major implications for financial regulation and government oversight. If the initiative gains further influence, it could lead to greater scrutiny of regulatory inefficiencies, potentially forcing agencies like the SEC to increase transparency and accountability.
However, critics argue that Musk’s personal conflicts and past legal battles with regulators raise red flags about his true intentions. Is this a genuine push for reform, or a vendetta against government agencies that have challenged him in the past?
Regardless of the outcome, this confrontation between Musk’s DOGE and the SEC could set a new precedent for private sector influence over federal regulatory bodies, reshaping the future of financial governance in the U.S.